2) There is no direct proof a few 100 ppm (parts per million) increase
in CO2 has any effect on the earth’s temperature. The fact is in the lab an increase
of a few 100 ppm of CO2 has a no effect on temperature, none, nada, zero, nothing!
In the lab you need to increase CO2 to about 200,000 ppm to see a 3 degree C temperature increase. This is an increase of
20% compared to the amount of CO2 attributed to man’s industrialization which equates to a .01% rise.
However it is important to understand the IPCC’s proof of man made global warming in light of no direct proof.
The IPCC claims a CO2 test in the lab is not a fair test because CO2 is in 50,000 feet of atmosphere. So there are some
theories based on an idea of layers and reflection in 50,000 feet of atmosphere that states a few 100 ppm increase in CO2
increases temperature a few tenths
of one degree F, not C but F. (Note this is all theory and not proven.)
However lets accept this few tenths of 1 degree F increase in temperature is the fault of man, but this is not much of an
increase so this is where the IPCC’s models come into the theory.
The IPCC models try to prove CO2 has an “amplifying effect” from this small temperature increase based on layers
and reflection. For example the earth warms a few tenths F from man’s 100 ppm increase in CO2 melting
more snow which exposes more dark land absorbing more heat making it even warmer, melting even more snow and so on. This is
a positive loopback.
However, these models are admittedly positive loopback biased
and any model positive loopbacked biased will show an increase in temperature from a small amount of CO2 as that is what they
are programmed to do.
These models admit in their executive summaries they ignore
negative loopbacks like storms and hurricanes. Storms and hurricanes remove a tremendous amount of heat from the atmosphere
in the form of wind and waves but because they can’t predict storms and hurricanes from year to year they ignore this
data.
The models also ignore things outside the climate system like solar flares and
gamma rays that effect our climate because they cannot predict those from year to year.
These models are also incomplete as there are forces yet to be discovered and understood that these models do not account
for today.
The bottom line is the only proof for man made global warming
the IPCC offers are virtual incomplete positive loopback biased models that have been unable to predict the current temperature
drop that has been occurring since 1998.
This is the IPCC’s proof of man made global warming,
man made virtual models. Fact there is no direct proof a few 100 ppm increase in CO2 has any effect on earth’s temperature,
none,
To believe in global warming is just that a belief in virtual incomplete positive loopback biased models.
